CTL Home >
Supply Chain Frontiers >
A Supply Chain Fix...
A Supply Chain Fix for FluInfluenza
causes some 35,000 deaths and 100 million lost working days annually in
the United States, yet a vaccine to fight the illness is often in short
supply when the flu season is at its peak. Researchers at the
Zaragoza
Logistics Center (ZLC), Zaragoza, Spain, have discovered a new way to
treat the problem by fixing the vaccine supply chain. The U.S. Center
for Disease Control (CDC) is embracing practices similar to the team?s
recommendations; so future influenza outbreaks should be less deadly.
Even
though there has been much debate in the U.S. over the inadequacies of
the country?s vaccine supply, mending the network by curing its supply
chain ailments has been largely overlooked. "The problem is that people
such as policymakers who have studied the problem are not supply chain
experts," said Prashant Yadav, ZLC Professor of Supply Chain
Management, who is leading the ZLC?s flu vaccine research project.
The
influenza season in the northern hemisphere runs from October to March.
In the United States about 20% of the population is affected, at a
total cost of about $ 12 to $ 15 billion.
At the heart of the
vaccine shortage problem are imbalances between supply and demand. On
the supply side, manufacturers have opted out of the unpredictable
vaccine market causing a chronic shortage of production capacity. The
medication is manufactured by infecting chicken eggs with the flu
virus, making yields difficult to predict, because the rate at which
each egg produces vaccine depends on its genetic makeup. There are only
two manufacturers now producing the medication.
Demand-side
factors are just as erratic, explains Yadav. The type of vaccine
requires changes from year to year depending on the strain of virus
that hits populations. And there are market mechanisms that compound
the uncertainty. Some buyers, such as hospitals, over-order to cover
themselves in case of future shortages, and then cancel when they have
a more precise picture of how many doses they need. End users can be
just as fickle. There are two types of demand, Yadav said. Elderly
people and children are high-priority cases that can be quantified
fairly accurately. However, the rest of the population is much more
difficult to pin down. These individuals tend to base their decisions
on whether or not to get a flu shot on the severity of the previous
year?s outbreak and may change their minds as the current season
progresses.
An inflexible supply chain also clouds the demand
outlook. Transshipping supplies from areas where there are surpluses to
areas where there are product deficits is routine in the retail
industry - but not among health care facilities that are fighting a flu
outbreak. As a result "there is a great deal of gaming and price
gouging," Yadav said, as sellers use these supply/demand imbalances to
push up prices. Moreover, a distributor that has a small quantity of
product available "would fax this information to every doctor to get
orders and create a false sense of supply," he adds. These practices
are difficult to prevent since no entity has an overall picture of
product flows and where vaccine excesses and shortages are developing.
These
market ambiguities often lead to mid-season shortages of vaccine and
end-of-season excesses, said Yadav. For example, when the U.S. flu
outbreak was in full swing in 2004, there was much heated debate over
vaccine scarcities, "but at the end of the season there was an excess
of about five million doses," he said.
Supply chain issues have
not been part of the debate ? until now. A study carried out by Yadav,
and David Williams, a 2005 Masters in Logistics & Supply Chain
Management student in Zaragoza, has identified a number of ways to make
the vaccine supply chain more efficient, and hence smooth out supply
and demand fluctuations. Here are some of the findings.
Create a Flu Vaccine E-hubA
clearinghouse for information on vaccine supply and demand would
provide a market overview and help to eliminate order gaming and price
gouging behavior. The information hub would improve the supply
visibility by tracking doses that are pre-booked, shipped and still
outstanding for all vaccine providers, distributors, and manufacturers.
The CDC has acted on this recommendation by setting up a Secure Data
Network to function as an information hub.
Improve Forecasting and Pre-booking Caregivers
such as hospitals that buy vaccine have no common, reliable method for
forecasting how many doses they will need for the coming flu
season. These facilities are close to patients and are in a good
position to monitor demand patterns, so providing them with better data
and a forecasting methodology would greatly improve demand estimates.
CDC has published a guideline that encourages health care providers to
forecast fixed demand more accurately.
A more rational system for
pre-booking supplies would also remove some of the demand uncertainty.
A possible solution is a buyback mechanism, where hospitals and other
users are credited for excess inventory at the end of the season.
Knowing that they will not be penalized for holding unwanted inventory
would encourage providers to place orders more responsibly. Health
insurance companies could underwrite the credits. Studies have shown
(although more research is needed in this area) that insurance
companies lose the most from vaccine shortages, because more people are
hospitalized with flu symptoms increasing the number of insurance
claims.
Establish systems for redistributionSetting up a
regional vaccine re-distribution pool so that supplies can be shifted
from areas where there are surpluses to shortage areas would eliminate
many supply problems. The CDC has decided to do this by shifting demand
rather than product. For example, a health care facility with an
inadequate supply refers patients to healthcare centers where vaccine
is plentiful. Such a redistribution system is mentioned in the CDC?s
interim guidelines for 2005-06. The agency will act as a central broker
for this network.
Reduce lead timesCutting the time taken to
produce and deliver vaccine would also eliminate many supply problems.
Using a human cell line to manufacture vaccine, rather than chicken
eggs, could cut lead times by more than half, and a Netherlands-based
biotechnology company Crucell N.V. is working with Sanofi Pasteur (one
of the leading manufacturers of influenza vaccine) to develop such a
process. The Federal Drug Administration in the US is working with
these companies to evaluate and approve human cell-based production
methods. However, there are questions over the use of human cells for
this purpose in the US.
The ZLC research team is continuing its
research, especially in the area of in-season vaccine redistribution
mechanisms. Additionally, the team is beginning to collaborate with
researchers at UCLA and other centers around the world that are also
looking at this problem. "These supply chain solutions will not cure
all flu vaccine supply problems, but by eliminating many of the
uncertainties, they will save lives, alleviate much suffering, and
reduce the immense cost of flu outbreaks," said Yadav.
For more information on the ZLC flu vaccine research project contact
Prashant Yadav.